The THEROY of Evolution…
To debate whether the earth and life came into existence through a big bang or by a God is something that when is examined and studied is something that should not even be debatable. It will be shown that evolution so called is a science fiction idea created and thought up of those that rebel against the fact that they are under a higher, intelligent being. It will be shown that evolution has no scientific backing or proof and to be taught as a fact or even possible fact is wrong and detrimental to our educational system. The fact that we have a society that rejects their very maker and would rather believe in a lie, shows what a decadent and reverse world we live in.
So long as people can deny the existence of a God, they are free to live and do what they want with their life, without worry of any consequences for that they do or think. What an easy life it would be not to have to worry about what I do and to not have to answer to anyone for what I might say, think or do. But what a life of chaos it would be if everyone did what he or she wanted. Everything in the universe has an order to it, a rhyme and a reason behind it; there is a precise science and math behind all the workings of nature on earth. Yet it is said that this all came from a chaotic bang. To say that order came from chaos is absurd and ignorant, and in order for scientist to explain this it takes volumes of books that contain only conjectures, fiction and wild imaginations.
From the beginning of time mankind has always been in awe and wonderment of this world and all things pertaining to it. All it takes is a walk out side or a simple drive to the mountains or ocean to know that we live in a truly amazing place full of things that are beyond what man can make or invent. The natural course of man is to question and wonder where it all came from, and to pursue answers concerning creation. In an essay by Frank Craw, titled “The Ultimate Deception”, he shows how evolution can not be scientific fact. Here are some of the examples he portrays.
- There is a complete and systematic lack of transitional life-forms (i.e., "missing links") between the various kinds of life in the fossil record. This would not be the case if the theory of evolution was a valid hypothesis. Sometimes evolutionists have tried to make a case that this or that newly-discovered fossil was a "missing link," but all such attempts have ended in failure. No missing links have ever been discovered among the voluminous number of fossils found so far.
- The fossil record also shows a sudden, inexplicable appearance of a wide variety of both simple and complex life-forms. However, if evolution were true, there would only be a very gradual increase in both the numbers and complexity of such organisms.
- Evolutionists can not explain how life could spontaneously generate from non-life, nor can they duplicate such a feat despite their impressive scientific knowledge and sophisticated laboratory equipment.
- Evolutionists can not explain how and why there is something in the universe rather than absolute nothingness, and not even they really believe that something could spontaneously generate from nothing. By “absolute nothingness,” I mean the complete absence of both energy and matter; a completely pure vacuum that is totally devoid of anything. Obviously the evolutionist faces an insurmountable challenge to his theory in this regard.
- One of the most basic, fundamental laws of science, the Second Law of Thermodynamics, states that things in nature always tend to dissolve and breakdown with the passage of time, not grow more complex which would be the case if evolution were true.
Obviously this law of science is most devastating to the theory of evolution, and desperate arguments which postulate that developing cells and organisms could have used the energy of the sun to overcome this tendency towards breakdown are absolutely irrelevant. Developing cells and organisms simply would not have had the ability to capture and utilize such energy in the manner that fully-developed organisms can. - Evolutionists postulate that life began eons ago in a primordial soup of organic chemicals involving an extremely complex process that culminated in the creation of a living cell. The only problem is that oxygen would have destroyed the would-be cell in its early stages of development. So evolutionists have also postulated that the earth's atmosphere once upon a time contained only methane, ammonia, and water vapor — but no free oxygen.
Unfortunately, for the evolutionist, recent scientific discoveries have proven conclusively that no such atmosphere ever existed. (See, e.g., "Oxygen in the Precambrian Atmosphere" by Harry Clemmey and Nick Badham in the March 1982 issue of GEOLOGY.) In other words, evolution could not have even started. - Over the years there have been a number of frauds and blunders perpetrated in an attempt to deceive the general public into believing there are "missing links" to be found in the fossil record. These frauds and blunders have included:
* Eoanthropus dawsoni, popularly know as the "Piltdown Man"
* Arachaeopteryx, sometimes called the "Piltdown Chicken
* "The Orgueil Fall"
* Hesperopithecus haroldcookii, meaning "Western ape-man"
* Pithecanthropus erectus, meaning "erect ape-man"
* Australopithicines, meaning "Southern Apes."
How sad it is that even with all these errors our public school system, a place where our children go to learn, is teaching evolution as fact. It is not taught as something that is possible or might have happened, but as absolute fact. In as early as third grade science class, kids are rushing home to let their parents know that they came from monkeys. It is said that religion and faith have no place in our schools, so we can not teach that God created all things in the manner and time frame he so deemed as fitting, yet a unproven uneducated theory is allow to be taught as absolute fact? Perhaps we should be more concerned about education reform, than how old rocks are or exactly how they got here.
